- job opportunities (7)
- JWV (15)
- links (1)
- Uncategorized (85)
- Veterans Business Opportunities (3)
- March 17, 2010: Man Who Posed as Hero Marine Is Sentenced
- February 24, 2010: Disabled veterans' firms get a boost from California
- February 20, 2010: Army study explores deployment stress on soldiers' children
- February 17, 2010: U.S. Troops at Lowest Level in Iraq Since 2003 Invasion
- February 13, 2010: National Defense Week
- February 3, 2010: VA claims expected to take longer in 2011
- February 3, 2010: VA wants emergency GI Bill payouts back
- January 28, 2010: National Defense Week
- January 25, 2010: VA slips slightly in deployment of GI bill claims system
- January 20, 2010: Delays continue for Post-9/11 GI Bill students
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
Subcommittee approves bill easing PTSD compensation for vets
The House Veterans Affairs Disability Assistance Subcommittee on Wednesday approved a bill that would make it easier for veterans to receive financial compensation for post-traumatic stress disorder resulting from service in Iraq and Afghanistan.The bill was referred to the full committee on a voice vote, despite votes against it from at least two of the three Republican members.Sponsored by Disability Assistance Subcommittee Chairman John Hall, D-N.Y., and 16 other Democrats, the bill would allow a veteran to qualify for the monthly compensation for combat-related PTSD just by demonstrating that the psychological disorder was caused by something that happened while he or she was serving in the “combat theater” as defined by the Defense secretary. Currently, the Veterans Affairs Department requires proof that the stress occurred during “combat with the enemy.”Hall said that narrow definition was not what Congress intended when it passed legislation providing the financial compensation. He said it denies financial assistance to the many service members who experienced traumatic incidents while performing support functions. It particularly impacted women veterans, who are defined as noncombatants, he said.But Subcommittee ranking member Doug Lamborn, R-Colo., protested that the bill was too broad and could cover hundreds of thousands of veterans.Hall promised to work with Lamborn and the Republicans on possibly refining the qualification criteria before the bill goes to the full committee, perhaps next week.
By Otto Kreisher CongressDaily June 4, 2009
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.