Archive for January 2010

National Defense Week


 
  1. Former adviser gives Obama an ‘A-’ on defense policy
  2. Grim trend in Army suicides continues
  3. Obama to request $14.2 billion to train, equip Afghan forces
  4. Senators seek military trial for terrorism suspect
  5. Audit faults State for failing to monitor Iraq contract
  6. Analysts: Defense budget likely to receive increased scrutiny
  7. Report reveals trouble with new Army combat systems
  8. Obama is forced to adjust State of the Union goals
  9. Congress has light load for State of the Union week
  10. Quote of the week

 

  1. Former adviser gives Obama an ‘A-’ on defense policyBy David Gauvey Herbert, National JournalThe president stuck to his word on the Iraq withdrawal, spending cuts and other campaign promises, Lawrence Korb says.Full story: http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=44411&dcn=e_ndw

  2. Grim trend in Army suicides continues By Katherine McIntire PetersThe service’s latest data shows an uptick in the number of soldiers taking their own lives.Full story: http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=44432&dcn=e_ndwReturn to Top

  3. Obama to request $14.2 billion to train, equip Afghan forces By Megan Scully, CongressDailyFigure is more than double the $6.6 billion already appropriated for fiscal 2010.Full story: http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=44439&dcn=e_ndw

  4. Senators seek military trial for terrorism suspectBy Chris Strohm, CongressDailyLeaders of Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee want Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab immediately transferred to military custody.Full story: http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=44455&dcn=e_ndw



  • Audit faults State for failing to monitor Iraq contractBy Robert BrodskyInspector general finds inadequate oversight has made a $2.5 billion pact to train the Iraqi police force susceptible to waste.Full story: http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=44449&dcn=e_ndw

  • Analysts: Defense budget likely to receive increased scrutiny By Megan Scully, CongressDailyLong-term efforts to rein in the federal deficit will require taking a hard look at the Pentagon’s spending, observers say.Full story: http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=44459&dcn=e_ndw

  • Report reveals trouble with new Army combat systems By Megan Scully, CongressDailyAll of the technologies struggled through a recent round of testing and will require significantly more work before the service can send them to a combat unit, study finds.Full story: http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=44428&dcn=e_ndw

  • Obama is forced to adjust State of the Union goals By George E. Condon Jr., CongressDailyPresident is expected to focus on jobs and a new-found emphasis on fighting deficit spending in speech.Full story: http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=44464&dcn=e_ndw

  • Congress has light load for State of the Union week By Anna Edney and Humberto Sanchez, CongressDailyHealth care reform is expected to go on the back burner as Democrats regroup.Full story: http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=44446&dcn=e_ndw
  • Quote of the Week:“Once you applied for a job [previously], it went into a black hole.”– Christine Griffin, OPM deputy director, during a Monday event unveiling the new version of USAjobs.gov, the federal jobs Web site.
  • VA slips slightly in deployment of GI bill claims system


    By Bob Brewin 01/22/2010

    The Veterans Affairs Department is on track to unveil in late March the first version of a system to automate processing of educational benefit claims under the post-9/11 GI Bill, but its software capabilities will be more limited than originally planned, a top technology official told House lawmakers on Thursday.The first release of the rules-based software, which the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic is developing in four stages — will allow officials to manage simple claims, but not more complex ones, Roger Baker, chief information officer at VA, testified before the House Veterans’ Affairs Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity. For example, the initial version will not be able to respond to situations in which veterans add or drop classes.The first release will be deployed to a limited number of claims examiners in March so they can gain real-world experience with the system while SPAWAR continues to develop additional rules to handle more complicated claims, according to Baker.Despite the more limited first release, VA expects to meet its original goal of having the system fully launched by December 2010, Baker told lawmakers. SPAWAR will have developed all the functionality originally intended for the first stage by the time it fields the second release in June, he said. That release will allow VA to move claims examiners off of an interim, semiautomated system launched in 2009.The third version of the software — which remains on target for a September release — will tie the claims processing technology to VA financial systems for payments to veterans, and the final step will provide a Web interface so veterans can manage their claims.Mark Krause, SPAWAR program manager for Veterans Affairs, said without the iterative development approach, VA could have faced a two-year delay in launching the system. “This is a good news story,” he said.VA failed to quickly process post-9/11 GI Bill claims for the fall 2009 semester, requiring the authorization of emergency payments of up to $3,000 per veteran at the end of September 2009.Keith Wilson, director of the Office of Education Service at the Veterans Benefits Administration, told lawmakers he does not expect any such problems in payments for veterans enrolled in college for the spring 2010 semester. As of last week, VA had received 115,000 claims for that semester, and it will have all those processed for payment by Feb. 1, according to Wilson.

    Delays continue for Post-9/11 GI Bill students


    By Rick Maze - Staff writer

    Posted : Tuesday Jan 19, 2010 12:43:10 EST

    New data from the Veterans Affairs Department suggest further patience may be required of students and schools awaiting Post-9/11 GI Bill payments for the spring semester.VA has been averaging 47 days to process GI Bill payments from the day an institution certifies a student’s enrollment.While VA officials hope having a more experienced group of people processing claims will speed payments, it will take major improvement to guarantee that students won’t have to wait more than a month before receiving living stipends and book allowances.More than 380,000 students — veterans, current service members and eligible family members — applied for certificates of eligibility for the new benefits program last year, according to a VA report provided to veterans service organizations.Only about 333,000 received certificates, an indication that some people who applied have not been certified as having earned the benefits.Not everyone who was certified ended up enrolling in classes; VA officials report 183,647 students enrolled.It is unclear whether everyone who enrolled for the fall term has been paid. Veterans groups report a handful of cases of tuition payments to schools not being made until January, and cases in which schools threatened to deny enrollment for the spring term unless tuition was paid.“Though VA believes they are caught up with fall payments, we continue to hear from veterans who haven’t received anything,” said Ryan Galluci of AmVets. “Whether this has to do with the schools or VA is difficult to tell. I’m sure there’s plenty of blame to go around. What we must do now is ensure that lines of communication among student-veterans, VA and the schools remain open.”VA officials have said they expect to have a clean slate of GI Bill claims for the spring term, with plans to have any claim filed by Jan. 15 completed by Feb. 1.VA officials also have told veterans groups that about 60,000 claims already have been processed for the spring term.As of Jan. 19, VA officials had not responded to multiple requests from Military Times for updated information on unpaid claims.For the fall term, according to the report given to veterans groups, VA paid students about $672 million in living stipends, book allowances and other cash benefits, and paid $505 million to schools. It also paid $214 million in advance payments to student-veterans at the beginning of the fall semester, when $3,000 emergency payments were provided because of delays in processing living stipends.No announcement has been made about whether the $3,000 emergency payments will be authorized again for the spring semester.

    Poll: 7 in 10 Afghans support US forces


    By DEB RIECHMANN Associated Press Writer

    KABUL (AP) — Nearly seven in 10 Afghans support the presence of U.S. forces in their country, and 61 percent favor the military buildup of 37,000 U.S. and NATO reinforcements now deploying, according to a poll released Monday.Support for U.S. and NATO forces, however, drops sharply in the south and east where the fighting is the most intense, the poll said.Nationwide, 10 percent of Afghans support the Taliban, but the insurgents are backed by a higher percent of the population - 27 percent - in the country’s southwest, the poll said.The poll of a national random sample of 1,534 Afghan adults was conducted from Dec. 11 to Dec. 23 by ABC News, the BBC and ARD German TV, their fifth since 2005. The poll has an error margin of plus or minus 3 percentage points. Field work was done by the Afghan Center for Socio-Economic and Opinion Research in Kabul, a subsidiary of D3 Systems Inc. in Vienna, Va.After steep declines in recent years, nearly seven in 10 Afghans also think their nation is headed in the right direction. That’s up 30 percent since January 2009. The number of Afghans who expect their lives will be better a year from now also has jumped 20 percentage points from a year ago - to a new high of 71 percent, the poll said.Moreover, 61 percent of the Afghans surveyed said they expect the next generation will have a better life - up 14 percent in the past 12 months, according to the poll.However, Afghans’ views about the direction the nation is headed are gloomier in high-conflict areas, such as Helmand province in the south, the heart of the Afghan poppy trade and the Taliban-led insurgency, the poll said.The survey also said that blame is easing on the U.S. and donor nations.Overall, 42 percent of Afghans blame the Taliban for the violence - up 27 percent from a year ago. Seventeen percent blame the U.S. and NATO, or the Afghan government or Afghan security forces - down 36 percent from a year ago.

    Hundreds of vets participate in test of sharing electronic health records


    By Aliya Sternstein 01/06/2010

    More than 400 veterans in Southern California have agreed to participate in a project to test how the Veterans Affairs Department can improve patient care by sharing electronic health records with a private health provider, a fundamental goal behind the development of a national network the Obama administration is pursuing.In November 2009, VA and Kaiser Permanente sent a letter to veterans in the San Diego area who had recently received care from both institutions inviting them to participate in the program. They were asked to allow the two organizations to share specific health information electronically. The pilot will determine if the exchange of records results in the delivery of better, faster care and reducing redundant lab tests.About 40 percent of the 1,114 patients asked to participate agreed to take part in the project. As a result, clinicians today at both health care systems can access records for about 450 shared patients’ in the San Diego area around-the-clock. Three out of four veterans receive a portion of their care from providers other than VA, according to the department.Tim Cromwell, director of standards and operability for VA, said the department was very fortunate to receive the 40 percent response rate, but “we think we can get a higher rate.”The success of the collaboration between Veterans Health Administration, the nation’s largest health care system, and Kaiser, the largest not-for-profit health plan in the United States, could encourage other organizations to accelerate their efforts in health information technology. Supporters of health IT argue it will cut costs; reduce medical errors; and improve outcomes by better managing patient data on a secure network that is accessible to authorized physicians, hospitals and insurers. The federal government has backed the nationwide initiative with about $20 billion in stimulus funding.Kaiser officials said the technological barriers to rolling out a nationwide exchange are minimal, because the technology already is open to the public and is not proprietary. VA can replicate this model with smaller, private sector health systems that don’t have the same resources as Kaiser, both VA and Kaiser officials added.Ultimately, smaller plans and practices will be able to easily find and purchase compatible technologies from commercial vendors. “In the long run, this is going to be solved for them,” said Dr. Andrew Wiesenthal, associate executive director of The Permanente Federation. “They’ll benefit from the work that we’ve done.”The more difficult part of the expansion process will be managing consent requests and opt-in responses, he added.The two organizations are using the Nationwide Health Information Network, a Health and Human Services Department program working to connect disparate e-health records systems nationwide. In this case, the network linked Kaiser’s HealthConnect patient records system to VA’s VistA e-records network.”The commitment from all [of us] to do a national rollout is very, very strong,” said John Mattison, chief medical information officer for Kaiser Permanente, Southern California.The Defense Department is expected to join the pilot early this year.

    GI Bill backlog climbs as new semester looms


    By Rick Maze - Staff writer

    Posted : Wednesday Jan 6, 2010 7:58:14 EST

    With the latest numbers showing a still-rising backlog for Post-9/11 GI Bill claims, a key lawmaker says he doesn’t think the Veterans Affairs Department is ready for a flood of new claims for the spring semester.Rep. Harry Mitchell, D-Ariz., chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee’s oversight and investigations panel, said he is “disappointed” with VA’s performance in the fall semester, which left 26,000 people still waiting for benefits when classes ended.VA officials said most of those 26,000 veterans have now been paid. But VA’s Jan. 4 report on pending benefits claims shows that more than 48,000 Post-9/11 GI Bill claims are still being processed. Some of those could be for the spring semester.“With a second semester only weeks away, I believe the situation remains unacceptable,” Mitchell said in a letter to VA, in which he noted he continues to get complaints about long waits.“The confusion and uncertainty about when checks will arrive, coupled with the need to meet immediate expenses, is adding stress to veterans at a time when many are already struggling with [post-traumatic stress disorder],” Mitchell said.Mitchell, a former high school teacher, said one of the most worrisome things he has heard is that some veterans are talking about not attending college because of benefit problems.VA officials pledged in December that they would have all claims received by Jan. 15 paid by Feb. 1 so they could start with a clean slate for the new semester.Mitchell was not convinced. “I would be remiss if I did not note that previous assurances from the VA have gone unfulfilled,” he said.Not getting paid isn’t the only problem, Mitchell said, noting he also has heard complaints from other veterans who are not sure they have been paid the correct amount. “The checks that veterans report receiving contain no or inadequate basic accounting information to help recipients to respond to keep track of their own finances,” he said.The House Veterans Affairs Committee is considering proposals from academic and veterans groups to simplify GI Bill calculations, making it easier for claims to be processed and for veterans to know what they are getting. Such changes, if any, would not take effect until next fall at the soonest, according to congressional aides who have studied the proposals.

    Army won’t recoup first batch of retroactive stop-loss payments

    If you were among the first 282 people paid under the Army’s retroactive stop-loss pay program, don’t worry: The Army does not want its money back.As anyone reading this blog knows, the Army’s program to compensate soldiers, vets and their families for being stop-lossed between September 2001 and September 2008 has hit one snag after another.The latest: Recent legislation says you are not eligible for the compensation if you collected a re-enlistment or retention bonus while being stop-lossed.The Army asked Congress to put that provision in the latest Defense Appropriations Bill, said Roy Wallace, director of plans and resources for Army G-1.The reason why may anger servicemembers who put their lives on hold and had to miss job opportunities and time with family in order to deploy with their units.Some soldiers who intended to stay in the Army may have waited until they were stop-lossed and deployed to re-enlist or extend their contract in order to get their bonus tax free, Wallace said. Had they re-upped before they left, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service would have deducted 25 percent for taxes.”Some people saw this as an ability to get them to a better financial position, and that’s good human nature, that’s good business from their part,” Wallace said.While there is nothing wrong with that,  retroactive stop-loss pay is to compensate people who were inconvenienced, hence the provision in the Defense Appropriations Bill, he said.But the provision does not apply to payments that went out prior to Dec. 19, which mainly went to wounded warriors and surviving spouses, Wallace said, adding it would be “un-American” to ask to try to take money back from them.Both the Army and Air Force have temporarily halted stop-loss payments as they try to sort out who got a bonus while being held under stop-loss.The Army now has all the data it needs and hopes to start sending claims to DFAS for payment again within the next two weeks, Wallace said.

    |